Archive for the ‘Employee Engagement’ Category
Thursday, January 19th, 2012
I don’t like templates for change communication plans. Why? Because no two organisational cultures are the same and you cannot just lift one approach from one organisation to another and assume it will produce the same results.
Also speaking of results I am not interested in results such as awards for well designed intranet sites, number of visitors to portals, the number of people that turned up to a CEO presentation or later said it was good or the worse I have seen, asking staff to recall what the key points were in a presentation.
And the reason why is that none of the above can directly be linked to bringing about results in terms of business outcomes, all they will ever do is measure the quality of your information strategies not your communication strategies and the difference is huge.
A bit provocative – let me explain why. Let’s suppose you are meeting with the CEO of your organisation, his concern is that the value he is looking for from change communication is that you have been able to connect with the audience, that you have been able to engage them, bring them to that “Aha” moment when they finally understand why things are changing and what they can do differently to contribute to this, the what is the easy stuff, it is information, it engages no one it simply informs them about what is changing. Even if you write stories, post interview videos online all about the why as well as the what, unless you design strategies that can be measured by business impact not by readership then your change communication strategies will not produce exceptional results.
Here’s a simple example.
The Business Objective:
This hospital wanted to cut costs while at the same time ensuring that its patients were not adversely affected by the changes. The hospital was also a major provider of healthcare in a small community, so it was essential that its reputation of high-quality care was not reduced.
The Method:
The hospital wanted to ensure that its personal care remained at the highest standard. So they sought feedback through focus groups, telephone surveys and directly contacting the carers. Three key attributes in patient care emerged as the main contributors to patient satisfaction. The hospital staff concentrated on improving these three areas while simultaneously reducing costs. Cross-functional teams were then established with employees who volunteered to take part. An employee with strong project management skills was selected to lead each team. They then presented management with a list of options to improve the experience of the patients, with details of the costs and timeframes for implementation. Agreement was reached on the changes and the senior management team ensured line managers were not barriers to the implementation.
The Outcome:
As a result of the changes implemented, patient satisfaction rose to 98%. This significantly high score contributed to a great lift in employee morale and increased motivation despite the cost-cutting activities. Employees were directly involved in implementing the improvements, and a staff survey indicated greater levels of job satisfaction.
Now the usual change communication approach would have been a CEO forum where the head of the hospital would have explained to employees why they needed to cut costs, then updates would be provided via email and the intranet on changes, there would have been face to face communication between team leaders and staff on cost cutting – all of this would just have been information. But by communicating and engaging the audience, both staff employed by the hospital and carers a change communication strategy was implemented that could be measured by achieving the business objectives.
In my manual, The Future of Employee Communication – 50 Case Studies of Excellence you will find more ideas on exceptional strategies you can implement that can be measured by business outcomes.
I look forward to reading your comments on strategies you have implemented and how they contributed to business results.
Posted in Change Management, Employee Communication, Employee Engagement, business strategy | No Comments »
Tuesday, November 15th, 2011
The best approach to implementing change is identifying your unique approach for each particular situation. Even within organizations it is risky to have a one size fits all approach yet many organizations aim to have one methodology for all situations.
Take for example a sales division, this most likely will have a different culture from the IT department just based on the skill set, the type of work and environment in which employees work therefore the best approach is to define specifically what will work within an organization not the organization as a whole.
Here are 5 tips to get you started.
1. The first is to understand the business context. This goes almost without saying that you need to understand what the business reason is for the change, what are the business impacts both within the organization and externally and what is the goal and vision for the organization as a result of the changes implemented.
2. What is the scope of the change, is it a new way of doing business, new technology, new markets, or a new organizational structure? These are just some of the questions you need to ask as the impact will be on employees and other stakeholders and by analysing the impact you will understand begin to understand the scope of your change strategy.
3. Once you have done this analysis you are ready to identify the best approach to implement the changes. This includes the communication strategy which is nearly always about information, the engagement strategy which is about designing activities aimed at getting the buy-in and support of all levels of employees including the leadership team and then identifying the business measures.
4. Implement the change strategy for all levels including the leadership team and assess continuously and monitor the success or otherwise of change interventions and alter as the need arises and continue to measure.
5. Change should be seamless and become part of business as usual activities. Where change processes fail is when they are labelled and treated as something happening over there and separate to the business. Seamless integration into the new way we do business is the most difficult but necessary aspect of managing change so ensure that the engagement activities designed in step 3 are designed to become a new process so that behaviour changes.
Change management is difficult, stories abound of change strategies that fail, either due to lack of support by the leadership team, the inability to explain in very simple terms that mean something to individuals why the change is occurring and the miscalculation in timing of the change interventions whether they be key messages or engagement strategies. To find out more about how to implement change and engage employees click here.
Posted in Change Management, Employee Communication, Employee Engagement, business strategy | No Comments »
Wednesday, November 2nd, 2011
One of the best ways to create momentum to bring strategy to life is to connect employees with the customer experience. So practically what does this mean and how do you do it? What this means is that you are looking for opportunities that demonstrate the connection between the work that employees do and the impact it has directly on the customer – whether that be with an internal or external customer. For more ideas on how to do this click here.
Today we’ll explore a few case studies that illustrate how this can be implemented regardless of your industry sector.
Healthcare Sector Case Study:
The Objective:
This hospital wanted to cut costs whilst at the same time ensuring that its patients were not adversely affected by the changes. The hospital was also a major provider of healthcare in a small community, so it was essential that its reputation of high-quality care was not reduced.
The Method:
The hospital wanted to ensure that its personal care remained at the highest standard. So they sought feedback through focus groups, telephone surveys and directly contacting the carers. Three key attributes in patient care emerged as the main contributors to patient satisfaction. The hospital staff concentrated on improving these three areas while simultaneously reducing costs. Cross-functional teams were then established with employees who volunteered to take part. An employee with strong project management skills was selected to lead each team. They then presented management with a list of options to improve the experience of the patients, with details of costings and timeframes for implementation. Agreement was reached on the changes and the senior management team ensured line managers were not barriers to the implementation.
The Outcome:
As a result of the changes implemented, patient satisfaction rose to 98%. This significantly high score contributed to a great lift to employee morale and increased motivation despite the cost-cutting activities. Employees were directly involved in implementing the improvements, and a staff survey indicated greater levels of job satisfaction.
STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE
STEP 1:
Identify whether your customer research can indicate top three factors that will have the greatest impact on customer satisfaction.
STEP 2:
Involve employees in the implementation of some of these changes.
STEP 3:
Measure customer satisfaction and communicate this to employees. It will be an endorsement of their efforts and thus improve staff morale.
Media Sector Case Study:
The Objective:
This media organization was concerned that as it grew, the level of customer satisfaction varied considerably across the businesses. The organisation wanted to dramatically improve its service levels and to become more customer-focused, but they also needed to involve employees in the process.
The Method:
The first aspect of the project was to survey employees in focus groups about what they thought the level of service was. The survey highlighted interesting results: most employees felt that red tape hindered customer satisfaction; half the employees commented that excellence in customer service was not recognized; and, a large number of employees felt that managers did not focus on customer satisfaction. The focus group results highlighted the areas for improvement. The first was putting together cross-functional teams to identify opportunities for eliminating red tape and improving customer satisfaction. Then, the employees designed what they felt were appropriate reward and recognition for excellence in customer service. And finally to address the issue of managers not being focussed on customer satisfaction they were integrated into the cross functional teams and had accountability for making them successful. The approach was driven by the CEO and the executive management team. It created a focus around customer satisfaction that permeated every aspect of the customer experience and was the main driver of the organization.
The Outcome:
Over 150 ideas on ways to enhance customer satisfaction were received from the cross-functional teams. Nearly all the suggestions were implemented, which reinforced the support the organization had for the project. Continued focus on customer satisfaction reinforced it as the key driver in the organization’s culture.
STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE
STEP 1:
Conduct some focus groups and find out what employees think about customer satisfaction levels.
STEP 2:
Implement cross-functional teams for employees to address some of the issues raised in the focus groups.
STEP 3:
When designing a rewards and recognition programme, give employees the opportunity to indicate what would be a motivator for them.
Strategic employee communication is so much more than updating intranet sites, organising CEO forums, company blogs and sending out information via email. The true value is in finding ways to engage employees by doing something differently and seeing the direct impact of the decisions and actions that they take at work. For more case studies click here.
Posted in Change Management, Employee Communication, Employee Engagement, business strategy | No Comments »
Saturday, July 16th, 2011
To have credibility when discussing strategic employee communication with senior management, proposals need to be supported by facts. Focus groups are usually held to gauge opinions about certain issues and ideas for solutions to problems. On occasion they are used to form the basis of the questions on staff surveys and customer surveys. Externally research firms use focus groups either to gauge public opinion about products or services. It is a good format as it allows you to explore issues further and sometimes you will discover issues or ideas you hadn’t considered prior to the session. As the facilitator, your role is to lead the discussion but leave the actual dialogue to the participants, bringing them back to the main issue if they have gone off on a tangent or ensure that all the topics that you wanted to cover within the allocated timeframe are covered.
Basically groups of 8 – 10 people are selected with the same selection parameters such as job level, type of job, or with customers of the market segment they represent. When interviewing employees using focus groups you need to compare the outcomes of different groups, i.e., sales managers, sales representatives, call centre sales staff. This will provide a more accurate indication of what all levels of employees who interact with a particular customer segment consider an accurate reflection of customer opinion.
CHECKLIST FOR IMPLEMENTING FOCUS GROUPS
When implementing focus groups for an employee communication strategy you need to do the following:
- Be aware that focus groups are not the same for each organisation, they need to be tailored to suit individual circumstances
- The focus groups should be held in like groups, for instance managers in one team, supervisors another, employee groups by department in others
- You should interview 10% of the employee base where possible to form an accurate sample of employee views, alternatively if you have a large number of employees, then at least a representative sample will provide the data to form the basis of a questionnaire
- When focus groups with employees are held there is a perception that something will happen as a result. Therefore you need the support of the CEO and reinforce that the reason for the focus groups is supported at the highest level in the organisation. For instance you maybe about to implement a customer focussed strategy and the focus groups will provide you with the data you need to set the platform for the project. The worse case scenario is setting expectations amongst employees and then not delivering and with focus groups as the employees have taken time out from their work and participated in discussions they will expect to see an outcome
- Greater objectivity is achieved when the focus groups are conducted by an external firm as participants are more likely to open up and express the way they really feel
THE MAIN STEPS IN FOCUS GROUP RESEARCH
- A planning meeting to identify the objectives, problem areas and scope of the research
- Guideline timetable to develop the selection of focus group participants and timetable for interviews
- Individual management interviews
- Preparation of the employee communication strategy
- Presentation of findings to senior management
- Implementation of recommendations
STAGES OF THIS RESEARCH
Management Interviews
A minimum number of individual half hour interviews with management are held to find out what they think about the issue you are researching and what level of employee involvement they would support.
Employee Focus Groups
Ten percent of employees from all areas of the company are interviewed in focus groups, eight to ten participants in each group. Each session is of one and one half hours duration and rather than a structured questionnaire being used, a subject outline is introduced and questioning follows on from this point.
Focus Group Research Interpreted
When interpreting the findings from the management interviews you need to identify what they will support in terms of employee involvement programs and why or why not, opinions on the business issue you are researching and the basis for that view. The focus groups will provide you with trends in answers and also indicate which areas of the organisation are most supportive and enthusiastic and will be a good starting point for your strategy. Focus groups of employees will provide you not only with information about what they know about a new initiative but also on what basis they have come to that conclusion.
The most important piece of information for any employee communication professional is to find out why employees have a certain view on a particular topic. Once you know this you can start to put together the pieces like a jigsaw puzzle and will quickly identify the key pieces that are missing. It is on this basis you then put together your employee communication strategy for any new initiative, whether implementation of an IT system to major business transformation.
Posted in Change Management, Employee Communication, Employee Engagement, business strategy | No Comments »
Tuesday, July 5th, 2011
Trying to keep momentum going during long periods of change implementation is one of the greatest challenges organisations face. This is especially true for major information technology system projects where significant engagement activity can take place during the design phase and the implementation phase but it is in the quiet of the build phase that momentum and engagement tends to lag. Here are some suggestions of what you can do to ensure that leaders as well as employees remain focussed on the changes ahead.
1. Implement team briefing.
Ensure that regular meetings take place with consistent messaging that incorporate change with business as usual activities. You can easily dovetail messages about the system changes and the reason why they are happening by connecting to the everyday business transformation that is going on. By ensuring consistency in messages team briefing allows you to ensure the focus remains on change and most importantly the reason why.
2. Link to customer service feedback and measures.
There are some powerful ways of linking the customer experience to innovation and change at the workplace. Access to market research on the customer experience can be a great starting point for wider business as usual transformation. The changes implemented are then measured for improvement in the customer research taken again six months later.
3. Connect with the wider business strategy.
What else is happening in the organisation, what is the bigger picture of what is changing and why and how will the system change enable some improvements in achievement of the organisation’s vision. By always connecting to the why the rest of the story will fall into place and the momentum for change will continue because there is always something happening.
4. Identify what employees know about the changes.
Measure feedback via focus groups to find out what employees are actually saying about the changes, what they know, identify what they don’t and what they want to know. You will only ever find this out by conducting the focus groups – questionnaires will not give you the answers you are seeking. Once you have this information it is easy to continue to plan your strategy to keep the momentum for change going.
5. Celebrate milestones.
It is important to keep reminding leaders as well as employees of the milestones in any change process and why they are significant. By integrating the general changes in business as usual activities and the specific system changes, this constant recognition of progress will keep the focus on movement towards the desired business goals.
If you keep the focus on business as usual and integrate messages about change and the project’s achievements then all you need to do is a subtle shift in balance when you get into implementation phase after the quiet of the build phase of your Information Technology system change. To have all the detailed information at your fingers tips on how to do this visit http://www.marciaxenitelis.com/products.html and scroll to the end of the page and order the complete employee communication kit and save 10% on the purchase price.
Posted in Change Management, Employee Communication, Employee Engagement, business strategy | No Comments »
Tuesday, June 28th, 2011
One of the interesting aspects I find in the work I do with clients is the amount of vertical communication that takes place rather than horizontal communication.
With most topics we communicate it logically from the top – the CEO down and we think that we’ve done a great job because everyone at the front line is understands how their roles connects with the organization’s focus. And in most instances we have feedback loops to check whether the audience understood what we have communicated.
However I suggest that the real value in employee communication is the horizontal conversations that we often neglect. For more examples of what I mean by horizontal communication that demonstrates the enterprise wide story click here. This is what gives an enterprise life because the focus in how the sum of each contributes to the whole.
Instead of focussing on silos by division everyone starts to focus on the enterprise as a whole. Here’s an example of what I mean in this case study from the motor industry.
The objective
This organization decided to use videoconferencing to reach five of its major corporate offices.
The company was introducing a new vehicle line, and wanted to spread the news on how excited the employees were about it to their dealer network. Although they could have chosen a newsletter or DVD to get this message across, it would not have been as credible as this choice. One of the main target audiences was a 400-strong dealer network, and the organization wanted them to see first-hand how enthusiastic the 400 employees at the business headquarters were about this new line.
The Method:
So an interactive link was established between these two groups. The opportunity was there for conversation and direct answers to any questions the dealers might want to put forward. Another key factor to the success of this approach was the installation of television monitors at the organizations’ other four regional offices, which enabled 400 more employees to be included in the dealer meeting for the first time. Although they were not able to communicate with the other two groups, they were able to experience the essence of the company and how it sells its product.
This was the first time the employees had the opportunity to be a part of the organization’s “big picture.” Another reason for having the employees present was for them to hear the senior management speeches from their location. Therefore, the benefits of this operation were threefold: the dealers were able to feel and hear the employees’ enthusiasm for the new vehicle; the employees were able to see how the company communicated with its dealership to obtain maximum sales; and, the employees and dealers were able to hear the speeches of senior management.
The Outcome:
This approach is as example of a communication approach for companies that want to communicate the enterprise wide story and connect the dots for their audience. By demonstrating to employees the “other side” of the business, specifically marketing and distribution, all the elements that make this organization successful are clearly outlined.
No matter what size organization the concept on communicating horizontally and not just vertically will make a significant impact on your organizations’ goals and achievements of the company vision. For more examples of how many other sectors have implemented enterprise wide communication click here.
Posted in Change Management, Employee Communication, Employee Engagement, business strategy | No Comments »
Sunday, June 5th, 2011
As I see it there are two ways to manage change within organisations. One of those is to constantly communicate information about what is happening and to collect information to inform your change activities. The other is to engage leaders and employees in the process of change so that communication takes place rather than information and you create a paradigm shift that the change process is owned by the leaders and employees in the organisation, not the change manager.
So here are a few examples of what I mean. Let’s say as part of the change process you decide to undertake a stakeholder analysis. There are two ways of managing this, the first is to get a template and circulate it via email and ask managers to complete it. If they have filled out the form they will let you know who the stakeholders are, what their issues are likely to be, how they recommend they are communicated with and how frequently. Another way of doing a stakeholder analysis is to use the same template but this time with the leadership group in the room facilitate a session where they have to discuss and reach agreement on all of the issues. This is definitely going to create a more robust conversation and sense of ownership. After the session as part of the signoff process you distribute the outcomes of the session via email and ask the leadership team to confirm via email that they are happy with the content of the stakeholder analysis. Both of these actions create a sense of ownership and responsibility that you would not have had if you used the first approach and just circulated the stakeholder analysis template via email or completed it by having brief one on one discussions.
Another part of the change process for any project is around risks and issues. It would be easy for any change manager to sit down and complete on their own or with the HR manager the people risks and issues during any change process. However you want the leadership team to own the people risks and issues, and even before this step to understand that there are risks and issues regarding employees and they should identify what they might be and what mitigation strategies they suggest. And then after all of this they assign various members of their leadership team to have accountability to deal with the risk should it escalate as an issue. So again if you facilitate a session with the leadership team to complete the risks and issues template you are creating another paradigm shift in thinking about their accountability for the change process to be successful.
And this is the difference, it is subtle but the results are significant. You will never achieve engagement with the leadership team for owning the people issues around change if you do all the work for them. You need to get them thinking, talking, discussing, arguing and finally owning the people issues regarding change if you are going to have any level of real success.
As always I am interested in your comments and feedback about the approaches you have found worked in engaging leaders to own the change process in your organisation.
Posted in Change Management, Employee Engagement | No Comments »
Wednesday, May 11th, 2011
The key ingredient for any successful change program is management and leadership commitment to the proposed strategy. The greatest challenge therefore for change managers is to ensure that leaders stay on message and do not waiver from the challenges ahead. Change is hard, whether you are at the frontline, or at the executive leadership level. But the most difficult role of all to cope with change is the leader, because pressures come from leadership team members warning against the changes, there will be unrest amongst staff and questions regarding the strategy. And it is always safer to stay with what is known even if it is not the best outcome for the organisation rather than to take a risk to try to innovate and do something new that is untested.
So here’s what can you do to ensure that the focus stays on strategy.
1. Establish a project management team comprised of key leaders that focus on enterprise wide change and dependencies and is chaired by the CEO or department head. This ensures that the silo mentality is broken down as managers are required to adapt to a new process, that is, thinking of their specific project and the impact across the organisation, which in turns changes behaviour.
2. From a change communication perspective it is important to ensure that communication is timely and aligned with progress at each of these change meetings. More importantly it is essential to communicate how each project and strategy execution is aligned with the enterprise wide vision and direction of the organisation. This way employees and managers will understand how individual projects are linked and how the organisational strategy is dependent on them all coming together.
3. All members of the leadership team need to be aligned. They must have consistent messaging regarding the direction they are communicating and that it is linked to the organisational vision and strategy. The need to communicate this face to face and influence support, provide specific details of the positive outcomes of the strategy to those who are accountable for driving aspects of the strategy.
4. Identifying and communicating the performance requirements linked to the strategy and confirming this at regular intervals throughout the year keeps everyone focused on the strategy and tasks.
5. Ensure that all managers make the strategy reviews and updates a key part of their regular team meetings.
6. Implementation is the most difficult aspect to manage successfully of any project because this is when it becomes real – most resistance will be at this phase of strategy execution, so it is important to have engagement strategies in place before this phase.
7. Identify those members of the leadership team most likely to be committed to achieving the outcomes and design a specific role for them to influence their peers and their management teams.
8. Where project management falls down is at the middle management level unless they have been engaged from the beginning and this means actually involved in the project and being able to influence the direction. This is where significant undermining occurs of project implementation and that is largely based in fear. Find out what the fear is and then address it and ensure that middle management are engaged from the beginning so they feel less threatened by the unknown.
Senior management provide direction for the strategy, ensure that appropriate resources both people and dollars are available, are focussed and directly involved and aware of all the issues and risks of the project and most importantly provide updates and direction on an ongoing basis. The role of the change manager is to support this by ensuring that all the other issues that could derail the project are dealt with so that the senior leadership do not back track on the strategy.
Finally to maintain commitment to change all projects needs to be integrated into the longer term strategy and vision of the organisation and for all employees from frontline to senior leadership to understand how the project and their role contributes to the overall vision. Change is only successful when it is seamlessly integrated into the way the organisation operates, not as an appendage to the organisation.
Posted in Change Management, Employee Communication, Employee Engagement, business strategy | No Comments »
Monday, March 7th, 2011
Most change in organizations today occurs because of large scale project implementation. Very often this involves new technology platforms but sometimes the change is purely a business project change initiative. Unfortunately change management still has a long way to go to establish its fundamental importance to the successful implementation and benefit realisation of those changes. Simply put, most project managers think of change management as something that happens later in the project management life cycle. So let’s talk about why this happens and what as change managers we can do to put it on the agenda.
The first and most important distinction to be made is that as a change manager our role is to enable change to happen, we don’t drive the change. This is usually a huge paradigm shift in thinking for project managers and business leaders and most think that we make change happen, when what we do is advise on the most appropriate tools and techniques to employ at any given time in the change cycle to engage employees in the process of change. It is up to the leaders in the organization to drive change using our recommended strategies to achieve the desired outcomes of a particular project.
The second issue is that most project managers and business leaders think of change management as the “soft stuff” doing the communication, training and human resources requirements of the change. What they fail to understand is that the “soft stuff” is really the fundamental driver of change, a change project, whether focussed on technology or business change is of little value if employees are not engaged in the change itself and the reason for it and therefore the benefits of that change.
So here is a way you can influence the thinking of project managers and business leaders when a new project is on the horizon. Firstly think in terms of how they think, generally they are thinking phases of managing the project lifecycle, so for example the following phases; initiate; plan; build; implement; and close. So firstly think about change management in each of those phases across the “soft side” of business issues such as communication, stakeholder engagement, training, human resources issues and measurement. Then decide what activities, actions and strategies could you recommend to be included in each of these phases and identify the precise benefit to the project manager and business leader for your specific change management advice to be included in each of these phases for the project success.
This way you can ensure that project managers and business leaders will understand what you mean when you say “change management” in the context of their paradigm which is project management. And once they experience the benefits of getting change management involved at the beginning of a project versus at the implementation phase, next time the challenge of getting change management on the project management agenda wont be an issue.
Posted in Change Management, Employee Engagement, business strategy | No Comments »
Monday, December 13th, 2010
The frequency at which the word “engagement” appears in any discussion about employee communication has begun to make me wonder whether we clearly understand what the term means. More important, do we understand what it means to our clients, particularly CEOs, when they talk about engagement? We have engagement tools, but can we really say that these tools actually engage employees in the process of change? Or are employees merely engaged with the tool itself?
There is only one question that you need ask yourself to find out whether your employee communication strategies are going to engage employees, rather than simply inform. That question is: Can you establish whether the tools and methods you are using to communicate with employees are changing attitudes and behavior or providing information?
Employee engagement is a shared understanding of the issues that affect the business, and that understanding leads to changes in employees’ attitudes and behaviors. Unless employees truly understand the issues and make a meaningful connection between their jobs and those issues, their attitudes and behaviors will not change. To achieve engagement, three things have to happen: The business issue has to mean something to the employee personally, the employee has to understand the issue (and I mean truly understand it, not just read about why it is an issue), and most important, each employee must be made to feel a part of the change process.
As communicators, we have the opportunity to become creative in how we communicate and engage employees. The ultimate aim in employee communication has to be to create the “Aha!” moment. This is the moment when employees have the necessary information and can say, “Now it makes sense,” “Now I understand, ” “Now I can do something about it.”
Tools are important in this process but generally they just communicate information. What we need to strive for are creative communication methods to engage employees in the process of change.
There are five steps for identifying what the “Aha” moment is and they include the following:
- Focus group research. Ask employees about their thoughts on the organization and its competitors.
- Identify the largest gap between what customers think and what employees think customers think.
- What would create a paradigm shift in employee’s thinking?
- Can you measure the impact of the change in thinking?
- How significant is it to achieving the business objectives?
So let’s look at an example that would be familiar to communicators: the annual report announcement. Typically an online annual report would be made available to employees via the intranet. Some employees read it, but most tend to scroll down to the last pages to check the annual salaries of the senior executive staff and then close the document.
Let’s imagine that the results in this annual report are very poor and the CEO is determined that employees understand the issues surrounding the poor results and become fully engaged to help turn the company around. Here’s how the organization accomplished this.
The company held four brown bag lunch meetings over four weeks—where employees could attend for free for one hour and hear from an outside professional about how to invest in the share market. Importantly, there was no obvious link between the meeting topic and the organization the employees worked for. At week three, they were analyzing annual reports and generally deciding whether they would invest in a particular company based on the information contained in the report. By the fourth week they were given another annual report and asked the same question, “would you invest in this company?” The answer was overwhelmingly no. And of course this last company was the one they all worked for, which brought them to the “Aha!” moment. Now the organization’s employees understood and were engaged and ready to become involved in turning the company around through teamwork and new initiatives.
Here are some steps you can follow to ensure that you can come up with creative ways to communicate with employees and engage them in the process of change.
To challenge beliefs that your employees have about your organization, you need to have facts. The marketing department is an excellent source of facts about the business, with research on brand image, customer satisfaction, customer and non- customer views on competitors and information about market segments. Each of these areas provide valuable information on opportunities to link employees with business issues that can be measured. For example, the organization should have facts about how customers feel about the service provided by the organization’s call centre. Employees will also have an opinion about how the believe customers perceive their service. By taking the results of the customer feedback and presenting it to staff this often creates an “Aha moment” because customer feedback is typically better than what employees anticipate. Once you have shared this information, the objective is to then explore ways that employees can become engaged in further improving that customer feedback. Focus groups are another excellent way to find out what employees think about different aspects of these areas and how their beliefs can be challenged as you need to help them better understand the issues that affect the business.
Key sources of business data are customer experience data, business results by product or service stream, competitor customer feedback, and measures of the attributes of your brand. These are sources of data that you can use as a measure of improvement as a result of your employee engagement strategy.
When selecting business outcomes as a measure for your employee communication strategy, you need to be quite certain that the strategy you implement can actually affect the business outcomes you have decided to focus on.
Finally, when it comes to any employee engagement strategy, whether it be total transformation of a business or improvement in one aspect, you can rarely go it alone. Partnering with other areas of your organization including marketing and human resources will ensure that the optimum outcome is achieved for your organization.
Posted in Employee Communication, Employee Engagement | No Comments »
|